tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post2148584721078943147..comments2024-03-13T15:35:30.839+00:00Comments on Tabloid Watch: 'Flattery'MacGuffinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16894506410560858668noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-48945544451955641102010-12-17T15:32:48.272+00:002010-12-17T15:32:48.272+00:00In my imaginary world (which sadly won't happe...In my imaginary world (which sadly won't happen in reality) I'm much amused at the thought of a newspaper that claims to have some levels of journalistic integrity going to the wall over misuse of pics of a 'celeb' by a pool in a bikiniSteve Mnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-61321263095063174152010-12-17T14:38:01.768+00:002010-12-17T14:38:01.768+00:00wow, it'd be pretty painful if the Mail Online...wow, it'd be pretty painful if the Mail Online was decimated by lawsuits because it's not paid it's celebrity stalkers the right money. That'd be ace.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-7527099105297610052010-12-17T12:00:19.213+00:002010-12-17T12:00:19.213+00:00Bill 'em!
£1,000 per word is the standard rate...Bill 'em!<br />£1,000 per word is the standard rate for use without permission I believe.<br />If they don't pay, take 'em to the f@ckin cleaners!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-30901526433082187492010-12-17T11:25:47.731+00:002010-12-17T11:25:47.731+00:00The paper that swore not to buy pictures from papa...The paper that swore not to buy pictures from paparazzi is clearly keeping to this promise by failing to pay the paparazzi...RogerBWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-52572571560134619772010-12-17T11:21:39.889+00:002010-12-17T11:21:39.889+00:00The current edition of Private Eye details some qu...The current edition of Private Eye details some quotes from the Duke of Westminster's daughter and her new husband, apparently told to the Mail's Richard Kay. They are suspiciously similar (identical) to quotes given by the couple to my paper, the Chester Chronicle, in an exclusive interview. <br /><br />Sadly, I can't find the Mail piece in question online. One of three things has happened:<br />1 Richard Kay attributed the quotes correctly to the Chronicle, then Private Eye was careless in its article and implied otherwise.<br />2 The couple sent out the interview - their responses to questions we chose, so kind of custom designed for our needs - as a general release after it had appeared in the Chronicle.<br />3 Richard Kay is a plagiarising scumbag.<br /><br />Discuss.Tomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08795287273167941597noreply@blogger.com