tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post6799438688969109268..comments2024-03-13T15:35:30.839+00:00Comments on Tabloid Watch: Un-Dressed to KillMacGuffinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16894506410560858668noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-66094981195274956832012-01-06T09:54:17.433+00:002012-01-06T09:54:17.433+00:00Wouldn't put it past the DM that the 3 complai...Wouldn't put it past the DM that the 3 complaints on twitter were written by DM staff/interns.Curahnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-81618445405846456202012-01-05T20:48:23.077+00:002012-01-05T20:48:23.077+00:00No congratulations also to the editor and proof re...No congratulations also to the editor and proof reader who have allowed the following multi typo in the caption of the second picture:<br /><br />Racfy scenes: The nude Irene Adler flirts with Benedict Cumberpatch's Sherlock Holmes<br /><br />Obviously they were so outraged they couldn't help but be distracted by the apparent anger in looking at a woman's bare back.Mushhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10853179270635459917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-58975335947559724522012-01-04T19:47:21.404+00:002012-01-04T19:47:21.404+00:00didnt adam sherwin used to write for the times? th...didnt adam sherwin used to write for the times? then the guardian?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-37901606579280350802012-01-03T22:19:49.226+00:002012-01-03T22:19:49.226+00:00Nice. The first 3 words of the page title are '...Nice. The first 3 words of the page title are 'Lara Pulver naked'. All the better to get those one handed searches, my dear.Five Chinese Crackershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09395982651352498540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-28687702301402370152012-01-03T19:41:39.089+00:002012-01-03T19:41:39.089+00:00I left the following comment:
"If the nudity...I left the following comment:<br /><br />"If the nudity was so "shocking" then why did the Daily Mail decide to reprint them for all, including children to see?"<br /><br />It got approved, got about 20 green arrows in the space of 5 minutes and then mysteriously vanished!<br /><br />Someone at the Mail must be letting through comments which don't fit the agenda and then another minion is cleaning up behind them!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-57722172442599481682012-01-03T16:52:35.569+00:002012-01-03T16:52:35.569+00:00The DM does seem to be getting a bit of a pasting ...The DM does seem to be getting a bit of a pasting in the comments tho. Again, they misjudge the levels of outrage, even with unmoderated comments. <br /><br />Did like this comment... "Won't someone think of the children ? Breasts aren't for children's eyes ! - Maud de Farquhar, Sodham Hall" I suspect that the name might be false. ;o)Tepid Halibuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15152638259599484466noreply@blogger.com