tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post3841415992476150576..comments2024-03-13T15:35:30.839+00:00Comments on Tabloid Watch: 'We accept that she does not have cancer'MacGuffinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16894506410560858668noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-78249550785512956702011-09-23T21:00:35.983+01:002011-09-23T21:00:35.983+01:00Having looked this up, I think there is an element...Having looked this up, I think there is an element of truth in the story in so far as she did, at one time, have cancer which was not diagnosed when it should have been, and a court case resulted. This was apparently not, however the court case described in the story, and happily Dr McGlone no longer has cancer (and probably doesn't appreciate people saying she does).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-18643237502613662902011-09-23T10:11:23.695+01:002011-09-23T10:11:23.695+01:00It does make me wonder how exactly did this story ...It does make me wonder how exactly did this story (and such stories like it) come about. If no part of the story is true it cannot even be a `Chinese whispers' situation so who made it up?John Bnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-91937251639939375192011-09-22T19:08:10.885+01:002011-09-22T19:08:10.885+01:00So, they got *all* the facts wrong? There are lite...So, they got *all* the facts wrong? There are literally no correct parts to the original story. I bet they even spelt the poor woman's name wrong.Crimson Ebolghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09980522480303126393noreply@blogger.com