tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post8061331962901726748..comments2024-03-13T15:35:30.839+00:00Comments on Tabloid Watch: Newspaper websites publish fake bin Laden 'death' picMacGuffinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16894506410560858668noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-41128786482737037632011-05-04T12:23:33.440+01:002011-05-04T12:23:33.440+01:00So how come the newspaper pixelpushers can get a f...So how come the newspaper pixelpushers can get a fake photo done in next to no time but it's taking the american's days?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-7681758110943571772011-05-04T10:22:39.680+01:002011-05-04T10:22:39.680+01:00As always, if the myth will sell more copies than ...As always, if the myth will sell more copies than the truth then go with the myth. Integrity is a virtue expected of other people and organisations.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-29439469286542527942011-05-04T00:25:19.382+01:002011-05-04T00:25:19.382+01:00Just a tad ironic that the Daily Mail are referenc...Just a tad ironic that the Daily Mail are referencing other media organisations that are making mistakes. As if the Daily Mail never make any mistakes whatsoever.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03367262651853572674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-44104771392454173902011-05-03T14:58:49.111+01:002011-05-03T14:58:49.111+01:00Article in The Mail referencing the Media organiza...Article in The Mail referencing the Media organizations that made mistake of saying it was Obama & not Osama that had been shot. No mention in the article of paper's that printed a 3 year fake photo though.<br /><br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382778/Obama-dead-BBC-said-basic-error-reporting-bin-Ladens-death.htmlwaynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17059632924378760464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-44357626450666149192011-05-02T18:47:22.525+01:002011-05-02T18:47:22.525+01:00Even if it was real, it's in poor taste to pub...Even if it was real, it's in poor taste to publish it IMO.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-39556674362379171622011-05-02T17:15:29.648+01:002011-05-02T17:15:29.648+01:00Even if you didn't know it's been knocking...Even if you didn't know it's been knocking around for three years or that the bottom half came from an existing photo of the living Bin Laden, it's such a crude and obvious photoshop you'd think <i>someone</i> would have noticed. If these papers are this crap at spotting fake images I wonder how many others have slipped through over the years.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-62937285556695782632011-05-02T12:18:16.151+01:002011-05-02T12:18:16.151+01:00You know journalists these days its "pics or ...You know journalists these days its "pics or it didn't happen"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2092552783161885712.post-66832738771258523102011-05-02T12:08:23.269+01:002011-05-02T12:08:23.269+01:00At least the Mirror have added the text "Dist...At least the Mirror have added the text "Disturbing Image" so I can avoid looking at it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com