The paper tried to pretend this had caused 'fury' and that the amount of tarmac laid was rather more than was actually the case.
The next day, in the paper's main op-ed piece, Janet Street-Porter repeated these half-truths. She clearly hadn't read the original article properly and so sounded even more silly than she usually manages by basing her rant on something other than the facts:
...sadly — and unstoppably — Snowdon is being tamed and turned into a Welsh version of Disney Land.
Now, a long section of the ancient Miners’ Track has just been covered with Tarmac.
'A long section'? Even if the 100m of new tarmac was in one place, it wouldn't be a long section - it makes up about 4% of the total length of the Miner's Track. That it's actually in three sections proves she's another Mail columnist who doesn't do her research and bases her reactionary columns on Mail headlines.
Laying a Tarmac path will just encourage more silly people to think they can conquer nature when they can’t.
Tarmac and peaks don’t belong together. At this rate, the UK will soon be concreted over from St Ives to Ullswater.
Park officials claim they want to make the route more suitable for those with physical disabilities. I’m outraged — they’ll be putting in platforms for the train and piped music next.
So Street-Porter sounds like she might actually be in a 'fury'.
Shame all her outrage - and all those words - are wasted on something that hasn't happened.
And she wasn't the only one to give this non-story more coverage. In his Friday column, Richard Littlejohn made light of an initiative from Kent Police's Gipsy and Traveller Action Group (GTAG) to provide 'safe caravans' to Gypsy women who suffer domestic abuse:
That's a lot of safe caravans. Quite apart from the cost, they've all got to be parked somewhere. It might explain why they're Tarmacking over Snowdonia.