But when they said 'Royal baby on way' what they actually meant was 'Andrew Morton's got a book coming out and he thinks Kate might get pregnant within a year'.
Forward to July and the People asked:
The paper said:
The warning comes after reports that Kate, 29, is due to meet her gynaecologist Alan Farthing in the next few weeks to receive fertility advice.
But experts last night told The People that they would urge Kate to pile on the pounds to increase her chances.
On Friday, the Sun had the latest:
A pregnancy riddle, eh? And what's the Sun's evidence for this speculation:
The Duchess of Cambridge was at the centre of a pregnancy riddle last night after refusing to eat peanut paste during a royal engagement.
Kate, 29, turned down the protein snack as she and hubby William joined the Danish Crown Prince and his wife at a famine relief depot. For years government experts urged mums-to-be to avoid peanuts, fearing a link to allergies.
For years they did, but that advice was changed in 2009.
So, she didn't eat some peanut paste. Is that it? Well no, there's an anonymous 'onlooker' too:
One onlooker said: "The Duchess does not have a nut allergy, nor is it like her to appear rude. The only explanation is that she is pregnant and has been told — like many expectant mothers — to avoid nuts."
The 'only explanation'? Not according to the 'senior Palace source' quoted two sentences later:
"Pregnancy is not the only explanation. The Duchess is still new to appearing in front of the cameras at official events.
"It is perfectly plausible that she may not yet feel comfortable eating while the cameras are focused on her. This is not the first time she's turned down food while under the spotlight."
MailOnline repeated the Sun's story on Saturday, and then added an extra detail on Sunday:
The 29-year-old was seen patting or holding her stomach at least a dozen times during a two-hour visit to an aid centre in Copenhagen.
Despite all the cameras, the Mail has only published one photo of her doing this.
Still, perhaps the Sunday papers could shed some light. The Daily Star Sunday said:
Despite the headline, the article stated:
Kate and Wills have chosen a posh palace as the dream home for their prospective baby...
The official announcement of their change of address adds to speculation Kate, 29, is pregnant – or will be soon.
But The People was adamant: Kate is not pregnant:
Prince William and wife Kate Middleton have decided against having their first child until after the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee, The People can reveal.
Speculation that Kate, 29, is pregnant after refusing to eat peanut butter during a royal engagement in Demark was firmly quashed yesterday.
And The People can confirm the couple have put off plans to have children until after June 2012 because they do not want to overshadow the Jubilee celebrations.
So she might be pregnant. Or she might be not be. Once she is, it's likely we're going to find out officially. Do we really have to have endless speculation until that time?