Thursday, 3 March 2011

Mail and Sun: guilty of contempt of court

The Press Gazette reports:

Two national newspapers were today found guilty of contempt of court over the use of internet photographs.

In what are believed to be the first cases of their kind, the High Court in London ruled the contempt occurred when the Daily Mail and The Sun websites carried pictures on their websites of a murder trial defendant "posing with a gun".

The publishers were taken to court by Attorney General Dominic Grieve...

Judge Michael Murphy QC, who presided at the trial, refused to discharge the jury after saying he was "quite satisfied" no members of the jury had been influenced by the internet.

Nevertheless, it was argued on the Attorney General's behalf that publication of the pictures had created "a substantial risk" that the trial could have been "seriously impeded or prejudiced" by jurors seeing them...

Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Owen said that - "notwithstanding that publication of the image of the accused with a pistol was a mistake" - there was a breach of the contempt laws under the strict liability rule.

"We conclude that the nature of the photograph created a substantial risk of prejudicing any juror who saw that photograph against the defendant Ward."

Lord Justice Moses, giving judgment on behalf of the court, said: "The criminal courts have been troubled by the dangers to the integrity and fairness of a criminal trial, where juries can obtain such easy access to the internet and to other forms of instant communication.

"Once information is published on the internet, it is difficult if not impossible completely to remove it.

"The courts, while trusting a jury to obey a prohibition on consulting the internet, have been concerned to meet the problem.

"This case demonstrates the need to recognise that instant news requires instant and effective protection for the integrity of a criminal trial."

The judges will consider what penalties and costs orders to impose on Associated Newspapers, publishers of the Daily Mail, and News Group Newspapers, publishers of The Sun, at a future date.



  2. The Mail have buried this on their website, way down the News section.

  3. "Sorry we are unable to accept comments for legal reasons"

    Just about says it all. When the paper is printing lies about immigrants, gays and Muslims it's fine to let their readers spew their bile. BUT when a story about the papers errors comes up they don't want to hear peoples opinions, probably because it shows that the courts in this country aren't as soft as the Mail always reports.

    I hope the fine is a very damaging amount and stops such idiocy from the press in the future.

  4. A fine? How about the two editors spend a night in prison? Punishment for them, but at least they get a good story out of it!


Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment.

Comments are moderated - generally to filter out spam and comments wishing death on people - but other messages will be approved as quickly as possible.