The main headline was yet another health story and revealed new research that caffeine is good for you and you should be able to devour eight cups of tea or four cups of coffee per day without any adverse reaction. Unless, of course, it's piping hot, in which case you might get cancer. The Express noted:
The research even suggested that people who cut out tea and coffee from their diet in a bid to be healthy may be doing more harm than good.
The story also appeared in the Mail and Telegraph.
The research was conducted by Dr Carrie Ruxton. If the name sounds familiar, it might be because she was behind research reported in May 2009 that Three cups of tea a day 'can cut heart attack risk by 70%'.
A few months before that - in February - she popped up to claim traditional tea was as good for your heart as green tea.
In December 2008 she was saying tea stopped tooth decay. Two months earlier her research claimed that Four daily cups of tea 'prevents heart attacks'. In February 2008 she was pushing the 'cognitive and performance-related benefits' of tea.
In May 2007 she was suggesting tea is healthier than water. The same conclusion as she reached in August 2006, when she was advising everyone to drink three cups of (guess what?) tea per day.
All of which smacks of dismally lazy churnalism.
And yet, who is Dr Carrie Ruxton? Who is this 'expert' who keeps popping up in the newspapers to tell us how great tea is?
Coincidentally, she's a member of the Tea Advisory Panel. The what?
The Tea Advisory Panel is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from the UK Tea Council, the trade association for the UK tea industry.
Hmm. And the UK Tea Council?
an independent non-profit making body dedicated to promoting tea & its unique story for the benefit of those who produce, sell & enjoy tea.
So the body dedicated to promoting tea gives grants to a panel which comes out with research about the enormous benefits of drinking tea. Imagine that.
And certain newspapers then receive a press release with those findings in and publish them without question.
Is this what Peter Hill thinks is the 'vastly improved standards of writing' at the Express?