Monday, 8 March 2010

Not front pages news (cont.) or how an imaginary dog can't eat an earring

Back, again, to the Mail on Sunday's front page:

In a post yesterday, this blog suggested that a spaniel swallowing a piece of jewellery isn't really a front page news story.

And that's even more true when it's completely made up.

Here's the headline from the online version:

Hack Kate Nicholl goes on to repeat lengthy quotes from a conveniently anonymous 'friend' about how Prince William gave girlfriend Kate Middleton some pearl earrings, which were then eaten by her spaniel. And to add an eye-catching bit of detail:

when the earrings finally emerged, she realised that there was no rescuing them, they were so badly damaged and chewed up.

Prince William's girlfriend looking through her dog's poo for an earring? It sounds a bit like the Prime Minister throwing a tangerine into a laminating machine. And, like the fruit-chucking hoax, it's been picked up unquestioningly by others, including David Harrison in the Telegraph (surprise!) and several media outlets in America.

There's just one slight problem.

There is no:

beloved black cocker spaniel

called Otto.

Because Kate Middleton doesn't have a dog.

The Express' Royal Reporter Richard Palmer tweeted this:

Which has been confirmed to me by a spokesman from Clarence House.

How did Nicholl come to write this rubbish? As a journalist, she should have contacted Clarence House or some other official sources to check the story. If she didn't, that's unbelievably sloppy. And if she did, and was told there was no such dog, but ran the story anyway, that's unbelievably shoddy.

As for the Mail on Sunday, their lead about Samantha Cameron voting Labour was quickly and comprehensively denied and now their other front page 'news' story about a dog eating jewellery has fallen apart because the dog doesn't exist.

Editor Peter Wright and Editor-in-Chief Paul Dacre: you must be so proud.


  1. Fair point, but have you ever tried to get a story confirmed by Clarence House?

  2. Excellent, more turgid nonsense from the journa-hacks. Did Kate Nicholl go to university? Did she ever learn that some things are worth writing about and others are not.. her work is currently fitting quite squarely into the "not" category.

  3. Sloppy? Shoddy? No, they're just big fat lies, but then that's nothing new with these stupid stories.
    Miss Nicholl is a disgrace to her profession. She and the Middletons deserve each other.

  4. Enough about mediocre Kate Middleton, she doesn't work, all she does is wait for Pr.William. I just hope one day Clarence House confirms Prince William is NOT going to marry Kate. She and her family are a bunch of socialclimbing, Royal groupies.

  5. What does those two above comments have to do with the analysis of the article.


Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment.

Comments are moderated - generally to filter out spam and comments wishing death on people - but other messages will be approved as quickly as possible.