The headline was:
One day later, the headline was changed to:
This appears to have been a reaction to criticism on Twitter, and in the comments below the article:
Just want to add to the chorus of comments: She is 14, she is a child, stop talking about her as if she is a piece of meat! The only point of this article is to point out how she is hitting puberty and to sexualise her and that is just incredibly wrong.. please stop sexualising her and other young girls.
- Isabel, Wolverhampton, 2/11/2012 0:56
i actually can't believe 'womanly curves' on a child as been written.
- rebecca , newcastle, 02/11/2012 00:32
One of your creepiest ever headlines, DM - just plain gross.
- boredwiththemall, justhere, 1/11/2012 23:27
Totally inappropriate headline. She is 14 years old, please stop sexualising young girls.
- Earlybirrd, Cheshire, 1/11/2012 21:12
It wasn't just the headline that was changed - several parts of Leah Simpson's story were removed. So:
The 14-year-old took to Instagram to share a photograph of her Halloween outfit and wasn't afraid to flaunt her curves for the camera
became:
The 14-year-old took to Instagram to share a photograph of her Halloween outfit.
And:
Elle was a posing professional as she wore a metallic maxi dress which looked rather demure at first glance.
Although it covered up her chest area and thighs, the design featured a high split which allowed her to pop her leg out of the side.
When she turned around, flesh was on show as the cut-out material scooped to just above her derriere and featured clasps which fastened at the centre of her neck.
became:
Elle was a posing professional as she wore a metallic maxi dress.
This sentence remain unchanged, however:
The model and fashion week regular has definitely got a knack for parading her best angles.
Elle Fanning is 14 years old.
In September, MailOnline published four creepshots of schoolgirls of unknown age.
Sounds like one of Jimmy Savile's mates is working for the Mail. Editors should be ashamed.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if paedophilia is a known cause of cancer...
ReplyDeleteShame on you all! I understand the Mail's editor is a devout Catholic, so he couldn't possibly have any untoward intent towards little girls.
ReplyDelete