Yesterday Leo McKinstry wrote in the Express about how all Britain's problems are caused by immigration.
Then it was: Labour's lies have brought the UK to ruin - Labour's rhetoric on immigration is a colossal exercise in deceit.
Yesterday it was: Labour's biggest lie of all is about mass immigration.
This cost-cutting at the Express really is getting out of hand...
Then, without any shred of irony, he begins his latest with this:
Josef Goebbels, the sinister chief of Nazi propaganda, wrote: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it"...
Those words apply exactly to the Government’s rhetoric on immigration.
Yes, repeating lies so people begin to believe it. Not that the Express or McKinstry would ever repeatedly use dishonest rhetoric about immigration. Or Muslims. Or political correctness. Or Diana being 'murdered'.
And so begins yet another anti-immigration rant:
As our country sinks deeper into the mire of recession, despair and social dislocation, the full extent of [government] lies on immigration has been exposed.
The dramatic rise in immigration has coincided with the deepest recession since the Thirties.
As the numbers continue to flood in, unemployment rises and living standards fall.
That's funny - the dramatic rise in the use of, say, Twitter has coincided with the deepest recession since the Thirties. Shall we blame that too? Does it have nothing to do with the bank system then? Or the
grotesque mismanagement of public finances
which McKinstry blamed for the economic crisis back in April.
the mass arrival of foreigners has imposed an intolerable strain on public services, especially the NHS, social security, housing and education, as well as creating a huge burden for the taxpayer, costing more than £30billion a year.
It's not totally clear what that £30billion refers to, it's not clear he knows either, but after suggesting immigrants are costing the taxpayer that much (by which he means white British people, as 'foreigners' don't appear to be taxpayers), he doesn't have to. The damage is done.
There are other outright lies. He talks about:
rising crime and ethnic tension
as if the latter is the fault of immigrants, rather than, say, racist newspapers which carry BNP slogans on their front page.
He should take a look at last night's Panorama too.
And 'rising crime'? The last British Crime Survey said the crime rate was stable and recorded crime was down 5%.
With no apparent logic at all he also states:
no fewer than 733,000 National Insurance numbers were handed out to newly arrived foreigners, making a mockery of Government claims that net migration is on the decline.
It's hard to see how those two things are related, or how one disproves the other. But he's wrong. As his own paper stated when the last immigration figures were released:
Overall, 118,000 more people arrived in Britain than left, the lowest net immigration figure since the EU expanded in 2004.
So, er, net migration is on the decline then.
McKinstry also uses the term
eventhough it is meaningless. What is a 'bogus refugee'?
Towards the end he says:
the Labour lie machine goes on remorselessly, bullying us into “celebrating” our nation’s own demise.
It's hard to know exactly how McKinstry thinks the nation is in 'demise' or indeed how this is being 'celebrated'. Apart from frothing, fact-lite soundbites, what evidence does he have or examples does he give? None. It appears as if any change to the population or the work-force is, to him, ruining the country.
Therefore, here's a quote from the BNP on immigration:
The current open-door policy and unrestricted, uncontrolled immigration is leading to higher crime rates, demand for more housing (driving prices out of the reach of young people), severe extra strain on the environment, traffic congestion, longer hospital waiting lists, lower educational standards, higher income taxes, lower wages, higher unemployment, loss of British identity, a breakdown in community spirit, more restrictive policing, higher council taxes, a shortage of council homes, higher levels of stress and unhappiness and a more atomised society.
And here's a paragraph assembled from quotes in McKinstry's column:
Immigrants 'continue to flood in' as the 'Government has lost all grip on our borders'. This is leading to 'rising crime' and has 'imposed an intolerable strain on public services, especially the NHS, social security, housing and education'. 'Unemployment rises and living standards fall' and there is a 'huge burden for the taxpayer'. We see a 'transformation in our society' with 'ethnic tension' and 'recession, despair and social dislocation'. 'Britain has become a place of apprehension, fear and suspicion.'
The differences are minimal. And the conclusion both want you to reach is this: immigrants are to blame for everything that is wrong with Britain.
In a week when the BNP will probably get more publicity than at any time before, McKinstry doesn't use his column to attack the nasty, racist party, preferring instead to use the platform he has to peddle a load of anti-immigration myths that only help that party get its message out.
It's the manure that helps the BNP grow.