But as she's posing in lingerie, it gives the infamous Daily Mail Reporter chance to have a go at her weight. Not that they cared when she they were leering over her wrestling, in her bikini, in oil.
At 5ft 5, and 9 stone, Reade is, according to height/weight charts, the recommended weight for her height.
But the Mail knows best. They accuse of her having
She doesn't have either. Is it even possible to describe a nine-stone twenty-year-old as having 'blubber'? Nonetheless, they sneer, she:
was still handed the chance to model Ann Summers underwear.
The use of the word 'still' in that sentence is as if the Mail can't believe someone they think is so unsightly can be an underwear model.
And yet, somehow, that doesn't stop them using four pictures of her in her pants (plus three others from her time on Big Brother).
They mention she was 7st 11 before her Big Brother stint, which puts her on the cusp of being under-weight. But that seems to be how they like their girls, because going from that weight to 9 stone means she has:
piled on more than a stone
and her weight has
Just so we can all see what the Mail clearly thinks is an unacceptable weight, here's Sophie's 'blubbery' tummy:
Clearly Sophie should be more like Kim Kardashian, who was back on the Mail website today with her two sisters.
Keeping Up With The Kardashians sure is hard work
the article begins, although the Mail website tries its best to keep up with every pointless move they make. The 'news' this time? They were at the opening of a cupcake shop.
Martin 'news is far more important to us than showbiz' Clarke must be so proud.